Monday, 25 November 2024
The Tyranny of Others
Movies brings the story of six men who were locked in an apartment in the USA because of the insanity of their father and mother. They were like that for more than ten years. This is just to, once more, prove that human beings, when given a choice over the life of others, are pretty tyrannic. Nothing is more important than never depending on others:Independence means freedom, freedom means life and true pertinence to human kind.
No Lobotomy
Brazil never had head implants as part of their psychiatric options and stopped using lobotomy several decades ago. That is important because Australia still has lobotomy and head implants (external) in a few states. With this, CIA bugs may come associated with a narrative connected to psychiatric treatment and, because of that, the victim may never recover their freedom. We would have to beg those who see a person bugged in their head from inside of it to first research into the topic: Is it possible that the place where they are has mental treatments that involve internal devices/head implants?
This article talks about the end of lobotomy in Brazil: 1956 was the last year Brazil let people in the Country suffer this. The concept was based on stopping aggression via stopping sexuality. As we know, not only one thing has nothing to do with the other but people usually commit crime because they are unable to have sex, not the opposite: While sex makes people more content and integrated, not having it makes them more violent. Some psychopaths have killed for being unable to have normal sexual interactions with others. Sometimes that appears in movies. We couldn't find any text referring to head implants (Australia or Brazil): we just know what we said to be the truth.
Friday, 21 December 2018
Physical Touching x Physical Assault
This is a lecture but it is wrong to touch others in a formal or professional situation, especially if that happens due to hierarchical powers; what 'creates this allowance'.
In this scenario, the student is unable to say 'please don't touch me', just like it would be in a situation involving a coach and a sports player or two mates from the same team during a match.
Things are worse if the touching comes from the same gender.
If it were the student's private time and he had decided to spend it with this professor and the professor did the same, then it would be another matter.
Any touching may represent aggression of the type physical assault.
In the same way that one has to consent with sex even when the sex happens between them and their wife or husband, the person has to consent to the physical touching.
Not many things are more sacred than the human body while we are existing in human shape: that is a fundamental piece of our beings and, for many of us, the same as identity.
The more we are touched in an improper way, so without a chance of having our will heard or respected, the more we lose self-respect and therefore our soul or ourselves.
If we lose ourselves/what is true for ourselves, already said Hubbard, we lose everything, so that that also has to do with Hubbard's sense of Personal Integrity.
Saturday, 23 July 2016
Attention: Muhammad (Islam) Was Super White and Had Black Slaves
Muhammad (Islam) Was Super White and Had Black Slaves
Watch what this link leads to and get the shock: Muhammad, the prophet from Islam, was super white and had black slaves. He called people from where he was raisin heads.
The worst possible leader, according to Muhammad, would be a black slave.
He also said that no nation could succeed if having a woman as a leader. As we know, England succeeded and is one of the most successful nations ever, so that his teachings are OBVIOUSLY a fraud. In Mathematics, it suffices that we find one counter-example to prove that something is untrue. Were he blessed, England could never have been successful if having The Queen or Tatcher on the lead.
Mohammad said that Satan was a black man and he enslaved African people. He apparently started this fashion, of enslaving black people. This expert says the Europeans had the idea of enslaving blacks because of him.
Whoever says that the prophet is black must be killed according to the Quoran, so huge the offence, like blacks are much inferior to whites.
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
Sexual Violation
Raped by Father talks about a girl from Victoria who ends up having the babies of what should be her father. The impressive thing is that they said to the father that they were not trying to make him feel bad but to make it possible that she related to him somehow. See:
A social worker and Children's Court Clinic staff member wrote to the man stating: 'None of us want to make you feel bad but we do want (BGD) to feel better about her relationship with you.'
There had to be a limit: Relationship? Feel better? What can make the person feel better apart from justice? Babies of the father? Social workers all knew? Wherever she asked for help they ALSO abused or violated her?
27 years being raped by the father is something to not only think about, quite sincerely. If it ever happened, it should at most be once, is it not? People would then do something and save her from the next one.
No abortion? Had two kids and they grew up? Were it not the miscarriages, she would have had four?
It is not that the world works, the entire human kind, in favor of men, is it? If it is a woman, we see them give even all love on earth in a possibly questionable relationship, say when they are female teachers and have sex with a male student, and then being arrested after a very short time. I just read one about a teacher/carer and the disabled student. I cannot locate that piece of news anymore but this one is very similar. This one is about a female teacher and a male student in Australia and the teacher got arrested after the FIRST sexual assault (assault only, not even close to sex!): https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/aug/07/sydney-teacher-arrested-sex-offences-student-ntwnfb
This is here to show how everything that women do is weighted up in a different and much worse way than what men do. That is one of the reasons for us to have so many homosexual and bisexual men: Men who violate boys are not punished in the same way that women who violate them are. Men are not stopped in a reasonable time and, if they are ever stopped, that is like ten times more than what it takes society to stop women from violating kids sexually. Perhaps there is an underlying South American paradigm that is part of our Collective Unconscious, which is that story that men need sex more than women or men HAVE to do it. We all know that, if anything, both men and women HAVE to do it, like it is either the case that we can all sublimate and sacrifice, and we all must do it at any expense, or we are all animals and cannot contain ourselves plus shouldn't, like there cannot be any difference of treatment between sexual violation that comes from men and sexual violation that comes from women but, if any difference is supposed to exist, then it would have to be that men are much more punished because their violation is worse, since it is also a physical invasion of the body parts, not the other way around. We need to aim at same amount of time in terms of rescue, punishment and tolerance and at the same paradigms.
This is here to show how everything that women do is weighted up in a different and much worse way than what men do. That is one of the reasons for us to have so many homosexual and bisexual men: Men who violate boys are not punished in the same way that women who violate them are. Men are not stopped in a reasonable time and, if they are ever stopped, that is like ten times more than what it takes society to stop women from violating kids sexually. Perhaps there is an underlying South American paradigm that is part of our Collective Unconscious, which is that story that men need sex more than women or men HAVE to do it. We all know that, if anything, both men and women HAVE to do it, like it is either the case that we can all sublimate and sacrifice, and we all must do it at any expense, or we are all animals and cannot contain ourselves plus shouldn't, like there cannot be any difference of treatment between sexual violation that comes from men and sexual violation that comes from women but, if any difference is supposed to exist, then it would have to be that men are much more punished because their violation is worse, since it is also a physical invasion of the body parts, not the other way around. We need to aim at same amount of time in terms of rescue, punishment and tolerance and at the same paradigms.
Saturday, 23 January 2016
Report Violation of Human Rights Urgently
In Brazil, one can always use the Human Rights Commission site and its form for denouncements:
http://www2.camara.leg.br/atividade-legislativa/comissoes/comissoes-permanentes/cdhm/participe/fale-conosco" target="_blank"
On the page, you must choose the option Denúncia. You have to be a Brazilian citizen to use the form, though: only those with CPF can do it (tax file number for Brazil). You could write the message in the English language and expect someone to read/archive it. In Australia, you can always use the services of TIS National to speak with any other Country in their own language, as you know. Their number is 131450. You then will speak in English with an operator and tell them about your needs. They will organize an interpreter to help you converse in their language during the same call.
In Australia, one can always use the Australian Federal Police site and its form for denouncements:
https://www.afp.gov.au/report-crime" target="_blank"
In the United States, one can always use the FBI site and its form for denouncements:
https://tips.fbi.gov/
________________________________________________
Nothing better for those who work or want to work with Translation and Interpreting than reading
Tuesday, 1 December 2015
Islam, Democracy and Human Rights
There are astounding 4,000+ Muslims on active duty in the United States armed forces: http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=647. The American government must be really insane then.
Islam violates human rights by default: Their beliefs go against the constitution of all democratic countries. On https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/Treaty.aspx?CountryID=187&Lang=EN, we learn that the USA signed for a convention on elimination of all types of discrimination against women in 1980 and therefore its people condemn any philosophy that means women are to be treated as inferior beings.
Accepting people from the Islamic religion as members of the US armed forces is therefore treason in highest degree.
Our Linkedin got a message from D. Holden yesterday (2/12/15): Muslims praying. And serving in the United States military. Why don't the media share posts like this?
Our comments were: It should be illegal. They are violators of basic human rights (freedom and equality) by default and therefore could never be employed by any American company, who would say by their armed forces?
The truth is the truth: Whoever is Islamic, man or woman, signs under a treaty that frontally opposes democracy, one of its most basic principles, which is to never discriminate against people because of their gender.
You put an Islamic soldier in a war and they have a choice between killing a man or a woman: They will obviously kill the woman, regardless of who she is. We may have Marcia R. Pinheiro there, the only woman in human history capable of achieving Poincare's score in Science by the age of 40, and Joe, the trader, and Marcia will die. A woman is an officer and files a report on rape by another officer, a male. If the Islamic officer is on duty, he will simply close the case and give it to the man.The USA is at war with an Islamic nation, say because they won't sign the convention on elimination of all types of discrimination against women, so say to, for the first time in history, free the 18,000,000+ women from Saudi Arabia from slavery, and they will then attack us from within... This is just to mention a few possibilities.
There has to be a limit for this story of tolerance: We can only include people up to the point at which that inclusion does not imply exclusion of the naturally or legally included.
The entire civilized world has to ban Muslims from any Country that signs for equality between genders and that is for sure.
These monsters have the courage of learning Science from women's hands and, even so, criminally, sometimes through atrocities, destroy their lives and bodies gratuitously as a thank you, and this in first world and nowadays.
We get a lot confused these days and we then lose all discernment: We end up thinking that we can include Islamic women in our acquaintanceship circle because they are the victims, not the perpetrators. Notwithstanding, if they are Islamic outside of Islam, they chose those beliefs, quite trivially, and those do include inferiority of women by default, so that, if we are women, we can only be insane, for we are choosing to relate to someone who may then vote for our death in a war simply because we are women (Marcia x Joe).
________________________________________________
Nothing better for those who work or want to work with Translation and Interpreting than reading
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)