There are astounding 4,000+ Muslims on active duty in the United States armed forces: http://www.monthly-renaissance.com/issue/content.aspx?id=647. The American government must be really insane then.
Islam violates human rights by default: Their beliefs go against the constitution of all democratic countries. On https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/Treaty.aspx?CountryID=187&Lang=EN, we learn that the USA signed for a convention on elimination of all types of discrimination against women in 1980 and therefore its people condemn any philosophy that means women are to be treated as inferior beings.
Accepting people from the Islamic religion as members of the US armed forces is therefore treason in highest degree.
Our Linkedin got a message from D. Holden yesterday (2/12/15): Muslims praying. And serving in the United States military. Why don't the media share posts like this?
Our comments were: It should be illegal. They are violators of basic human rights (freedom and equality) by default and therefore could never be employed by any American company, who would say by their armed forces?
The truth is the truth: Whoever is Islamic, man or woman, signs under a treaty that frontally opposes democracy, one of its most basic principles, which is to never discriminate against people because of their gender.
You put an Islamic soldier in a war and they have a choice between killing a man or a woman: They will obviously kill the woman, regardless of who she is. We may have Marcia R. Pinheiro there, the only woman in human history capable of achieving Poincare's score in Science by the age of 40, and Joe, the trader, and Marcia will die. A woman is an officer and files a report on rape by another officer, a male. If the Islamic officer is on duty, he will simply close the case and give it to the man.The USA is at war with an Islamic nation, say because they won't sign the convention on elimination of all types of discrimination against women, so say to, for the first time in history, free the 18,000,000+ women from Saudi Arabia from slavery, and they will then attack us from within... This is just to mention a few possibilities.
There has to be a limit for this story of tolerance: We can only include people up to the point at which that inclusion does not imply exclusion of the naturally or legally included.
The entire civilized world has to ban Muslims from any Country that signs for equality between genders and that is for sure.
These monsters have the courage of learning Science from women's hands and, even so, criminally, sometimes through atrocities, destroy their lives and bodies gratuitously as a thank you, and this in first world and nowadays.
We get a lot confused these days and we then lose all discernment: We end up thinking that we can include Islamic women in our acquaintanceship circle because they are the victims, not the perpetrators. Notwithstanding, if they are Islamic outside of Islam, they chose those beliefs, quite trivially, and those do include inferiority of women by default, so that, if we are women, we can only be insane, for we are choosing to relate to someone who may then vote for our death in a war simply because we are women (Marcia x Joe).
________________________________________________
Nothing better for those who work or want to work with Translation and Interpreting than reading
____________________________________
