https://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/beauty/a/30108529/woman-who-tried-to-ban-muslims-from-her-beauty-salon-gets-arrested/" target="_blank" makes us think about things a bit deeper: Could we refuse to serve a man who we saw killing his own mother? Perhaps there was someone else who claimed to witness someone else killing his mother and the police did not arrest him because they are still investigating. Could we stand for what we believe and refuse to serve this individual?
Could we refuse to serve the woman who had sex with our father when he was married to our mother if we are sure that she did that?
Could we refuse to serve a group of boys who have just stolen a bike if we watched them steal from another? They managed to escape and ended up inside of our business.
We watched a group of ten boys vandalizing the business of our fellow. They have not yet been arrested because the police is doubting our capacity to see at that time. Can we refuse to serve those?
Islam violates the most fundamental rights of women in the clearest way as possible. Places like Australia and Brazil sign for human rights, what means that the entire nation supports those. Would it not be treason serving Islamic men? They definitely disagree with our declared and legal national principles.
They still arrive at our premises and demand that they be served exclusively by men. Would that not be sexism? Can they do that inside of our Country?
And if they cannot do that, but they obviously do it, would it not be the case that our violation of the laws are of equivalent nature? If they do not go to jail for refusing to be served by women, do we have to go to jail for refusing to accepting them as customers?
Going a bit beyond all this, we know that occidental women cannot enter Islam because they will be physically attacked, they may become slaves of some man, etc. In this case, could we not have reciprocity going on and refuse to receive at least their men or at least legally allow people to violate their rights and commit crime against them?
What should be the limits of acceptance and tolerance?
Also, if the law forbids writings of that sort, it certainly allows for protests that be orderly. If the lady accompanied her refusal with a note of protest and explained that she will refuse to serve Islamic men until Islamism accepts equality between men and women, would she be accepted for then being classified as a person protesting against cruel regimens?
________________________________________________
Nothing better for those who work or want to work with Translation and Interpreting than reading
